You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-13-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lehana Thabane, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Shiyuan Zhang, Zainab Samaan, Maura Marcucci, Chenglin Ye, Marroon Thabane, Lora Giangregorio, Brittany Dennis, Daisy Kosa, Victoria Borg Debono, Rejane Dillenburg, Vincent Fruci, Monica Bawor, Juneyoung Lee, George Wells, Charles H Goldsmith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 28 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 7% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 79 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 82% |
| Scientists | 14 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1273 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 208 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 197 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 184 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 81 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 6% |
| Other | 242 | 19% |
| Unknown | 307 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 371 | 29% |
| Psychology | 84 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 76 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 44 | 3% |
| Other | 292 | 22% |
| Unknown | 378 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#376,273
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#27
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,563
of 207,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.