You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reusable, polyethylene glycol-structured microfluidic channel for particle immunoassays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Engineering, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-1611-3-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jin-Hee Han, Jeong-Yeol Yoon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 13 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#134
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,939
of 104,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.