↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer amongst postmenopausal women: a model-based economic evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer amongst postmenopausal women: a model-based economic evaluation
Published in
BMC Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12916-017-0803-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben Kearns, Jim Chilcott, Sophie Whyte, Louise Preston, Susi Sadler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Chemistry 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,403,545
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3,347
of 3,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,522
of 420,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#63
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.