↓ Skip to main content

Pregnant women’s knowledge of weight, weight gain, complications of obesity and weight management strategies in pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pregnant women’s knowledge of weight, weight gain, complications of obesity and weight management strategies in pregnancy
Published in
BMC Research Notes, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Shub, Emily Y-S Huning, Karen J Campbell, Elizabeth A McCarthy

Abstract

Obesity is increasingly common in the obstetric population. Maternal obesity and excess gestational weight gain (GWG) are associated with increased perinatal risk. There is limited published data demonstrating the level of pregnant women's knowledge regarding these problems, their consequences and management strategies.We aimed to assess the level of knowledge of pregnant women regarding: (i) their own weight and body mass index (BMI) category, (ii) awareness of guidelines for GWG, (iii) concordance of women's own expectations with guidelines, (iv) knowledge of complications associated with excess GWG, and (v) knowledge of safe weight management strategies in pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 20%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 43 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2013.
All research outputs
#4,067,041
of 24,664,952 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#575
of 4,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,057
of 201,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,664,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.