You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intracerebroventricular administration of lipopolysaccharide induces indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-dependent depression-like behaviors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-2094-10-87 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus A Lawson, Jennifer M Parrott, Robert H McCusker, Robert Dantzer, Keith W Kelley, Jason C O’Connor |
Abstract |
Activation of the tryptophan degrading enzyme indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is associated with the development of behavioral signs of depression. Systemic immune challenge induces IDO1 in both the periphery and the brain, leading to increased circulating and brain concentrations of kynurenines. However, whether IDO1 activity within the brain is necessary for the manifestation of depression-like behavior of mice following a central immune challenge remains to be elucidated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Italy | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
Researcher | 19 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 15% |
Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 24 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#12,878,673
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,356
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,757
of 196,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.