You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of a cognitive training on spatial learning and associated functional brain activations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-14-73 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirsten Hötting, Kathrin Holzschneider, Anna Stenzel, Thomas Wolbers, Brigitte Röder |
Abstract |
Both cognitive and physical exercise have been discussed as promising interventions for healthy cognitive aging. The present study assessed the effects of cognitive training (spatial vs. perceptual training) and physical training (endurance training vs. non-endurance training) on spatial learning and associated brain activation in 33 adults (40-55 years). Spatial learning was assessed with a virtual maze task, and at the same time neural correlates were measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 256 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 19% |
Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
Researcher | 29 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
Other | 45 | 17% |
Unknown | 55 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 58 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 29 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 18 | 7% |
Other | 50 | 19% |
Unknown | 59 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#3,023,500
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#116
of 1,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,066
of 200,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.