You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Green tea polyphenols alleviate early BBB damage during experimental focal cerebral ischemia through regulating tight junctions and PKCalpha signaling
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-187 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaobai Liu, Zhenhua Wang, Ping Wang, Bo Yu, Yunhui Liu, Yixue Xue |
Abstract |
It has been supposed that green tea polyphenols (GTPs) have neuroprotective effects on brain damage after brain ischemia in animal experiments. Little is known regarding GTPs' protective effects against the blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption after ischemic stroke. We investigated the effects of GTPs on the expression of claudin-5, occludin, and ZO-1, and the corresponding cellular mechanisms involved in the early stage of cerebral ischemia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2015.
All research outputs
#13,386,934
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,502
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,730
of 197,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#29
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.