↓ Skip to main content

Physical durability of PermaNet 2.0 long-lasting insecticidal nets over three to 32 months of use in Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical durability of PermaNet 2.0 long-lasting insecticidal nets over three to 32 months of use in Ethiopia
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aprielle B Wills, Stephen C Smith, Gedeon Y Anshebo, Patricia M Graves, Tekola Endeshaw, Estifanos B Shargie, Mesele Damte, Teshome Gebre, Aryc W Mosher, Amy E Patterson, Yohannes B Tesema, Frank O Richards, Paul M Emerson

Abstract

Ethiopia scaled up net distribution markedly starting in 2006. Information on expected net life under field conditions (physical durability and persistence of insecticidal activity) is needed to improve planning for net replacement. Standardization of physical durability assessment methods is lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
Sudan 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 16%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Environmental Science 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#6,505,265
of 24,030,717 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,731
of 5,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,363
of 198,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#18
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,030,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.