↓ Skip to main content

Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
1011 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
675 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-2-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald J Feise

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 675 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Greece 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 639 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 24%
Researcher 132 20%
Student > Master 61 9%
Student > Bachelor 44 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 6%
Other 139 21%
Unknown 97 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 14%
Psychology 85 13%
Social Sciences 29 4%
Neuroscience 22 3%
Other 145 21%
Unknown 166 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,601,275
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#553
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,972
of 44,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them