You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiac ischemia in patients with septic shock randomized to vasopressin or norepinephrine
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc12789 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sangeeta Mehta, John Granton, Anthony C Gordon, Deborah J Cook, Stephen Lapinsky, Gary Newton, Kris Bandayrel, Anjuli Little, Chuin Siau, Dieter Ayers, Joel Singer, Terry CK Lee, Keith R Walley, Michelle Storms, D James Cooper, Cheryl L Holmes, Paul Hebert, Jeffrey Presneill, James A Russell, for the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST) Investigators |
Abstract |
Cardiac troponins are sensitive and specific biomarkers of myocardial necrosis. We evaluated troponin, CK, and ECG abnormalities in patients with septic shock and compared the effect of vasopressin (VP) versus norepinephrine (NE) on troponin, CK, and ECGs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 14% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Other | 32 | 28% |
Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 60% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,380
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,107
of 209,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#79
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.