You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-3-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vivienne H Chuter |
| Abstract |
The Foot Posture Index (FPI) provides an easily applicable, validated method for quantifying static foot posture. However there is limited evidence relating to the ability of the FPI to predict dynamic foot function. This study aimed to assess the relationship between dynamic rearfoot motion and FPI scores in pronated and normal foot types. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 34% |
| Sports and Recreations | 27 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
| Engineering | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,341,711
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#728
of 784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,022
of 83,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.