↓ Skip to main content

Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-3-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivienne H Chuter

Abstract

The Foot Posture Index (FPI) provides an easily applicable, validated method for quantifying static foot posture. However there is limited evidence relating to the ability of the FPI to predict dynamic foot function. This study aimed to assess the relationship between dynamic rearfoot motion and FPI scores in pronated and normal foot types.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 136 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 34%
Sports and Recreations 27 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Engineering 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 22 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#9,954,211
of 12,434,464 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#451
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,204
of 151,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,434,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.