↓ Skip to main content

The global cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry (GCMR) of the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR): its goals, rationale, data infrastructure, and current developments

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry (GCMR) of the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (SCMR): its goals, rationale, data infrastructure, and current developments
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12968-016-0321-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

The Global Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Registry Investigators, Raymond Y. Kwong, Steffen E. Petersen, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Andrew E. Arai, Scott E. Bingham, Yucheng Chen, Yuna L. Choi, Ricardo C. Cury, Vanessa M. Ferreira, Scott D. Flamm, Kevin Steel, W. Patricia Bandettini, Edward T. Martin, Leelakrishna Nallamshetty, Stefan Neubauer, Subha V. Raman, Erik B. Schelbert, Uma S. Valeti, Jie Jane Cao, Nathaniel Reichek, Alistair A. Young, Lyuba Fexon, Misha Pivovarov, Victor A. Ferrari, Orlando P. Simonetti

Abstract

With multifaceted imaging capabilities, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is playing a progressively increasing role in the management of various cardiac conditions. A global registry that harmonizes data from international centers, with participation policies that aim to be open and inclusive of all CMR programs, can support future evidence-based growth in CMR. The Global CMR Registry (GCMR) was established in 2013 under the auspices of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR). The GCMR team has developed a web-based data infrastructure, data use policy and participation agreement, data-harmonizing methods, and site-training tools based on results from an international survey of CMR programs. At present, 17 CMR programs have established a legal agreement to participate in GCMR, amongst them 10 have contributed CMR data, totaling 62,456 studies. There is currently a predominance of CMR centers with more than 10 years of experience (65%), and the majority are located in the United States (63%). The most common clinical indications for CMR have included assessment of cardiomyopathy (21%), myocardial viability (16%), stress CMR perfusion for chest pain syndromes (16%), and evaluation of etiology of arrhythmias or planning of electrophysiological studies (15%) with assessment of cardiomyopathy representing the most rapidly growing indication in the past decade. Most CMR studies involved the use of gadolinium-based contrast media (95%). We present the goals, mission and vision, infrastructure, preliminary results, and challenges of the GCMR. Identification number on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02806193 . Registered 17 June 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 15 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 36%
Engineering 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,820,485
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#304
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,624
of 421,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.