↓ Skip to main content

Fatigue in adults with traumatic brain injury: predictors and consequences. A systematic review of longitudinal study protocols

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fatigue in adults with traumatic brain injury: predictors and consequences. A systematic review of longitudinal study protocols
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatyana Mollayeva, Tetyana Kendzerska, Shirin Mollayeva, Colin M Shapiro, Angela Colantonio, J David Cassidy

Abstract

Despite strong indications that fatigue is the most common and debilitating symptom after traumatic brain injury, little is known about its frequency, natural history, or relation to other factors. The current protocol outlines a strategy for a systematic review that will identify, assess, and critically appraise studies that assessed predictors for fatigue and the consequences of fatigue on at least two separate time points following traumatic brain injury.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 17 29%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 29%
Psychology 13 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,179,369
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#736
of 1,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,196
of 151,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.