↓ Skip to main content

Natural Bagaza virus infection in game birds in southern Spain

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Natural Bagaza virus infection in game birds in southern Spain
Published in
Veterinary Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1297-9716-43-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Gamino, Ana-Valeria Gutiérrez-Guzmán, Isabel G Fernández-de-Mera, José-Antonio Ortíz, Mauricio Durán-Martín, José de la Fuente, Christian Gortázar, Ursula Höfle

Abstract

In late summer 2010 a mosquito born flavivirus not previously reported in Europe called Bagaza virus (BAGV) caused high mortality in red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa) and ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). We studied clinical findings, lesions and viral antigen distribution in naturally BAGV infected game birds in order to understand the apparently higher impact on red-legged partridges. The disease induced neurologic signs in the two galliform species and, to a lesser extent, in common wood pigeons (Columba palumbus). In red-legged partridges infection by BAGV caused severe haemosiderosis in the liver and spleen that was absent in pheasants and less evident in common wood pigeons. Also, BAGV antigen was present in vascular endothelium in multiple organs in red-legged partridges, and in the spleen in common wood pigeons, while in ring-necked pheasants it was only detected in neurons and glial cells in the brain. These findings indicate tropism of BAGV for endothelial cells and a severe haemolytic process in red-legged partridges in addition to the central nervous lesions that were found in all three species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 28%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#1,035
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,493
of 187,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.