↓ Skip to main content

Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with non-contact soft tissue injuries in elite professional soccer players: influence on degree of injury and recovery time

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with non-contact soft tissue injuries in elite professional soccer players: influence on degree of injury and recovery time
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-221
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricard Pruna, Rosa Artells, Jordi Ribas, Bruno Montoro, Francesc Cos, Carme Muñoz, Gil Rodas, Nicola Maffulli

Abstract

The biological mechanisms involved in non-contact musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries (NCMSTI) are poorly understood. Genetic risk factors may be associated with susceptibility to injuries, and may exert marked influence on recovery times.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 160 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 38 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 21%
Sports and Recreations 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 42 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,235,277
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#193
of 4,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,326
of 210,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.