You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zareena Abidin, Mary Davoren, Leena Naughton, Olivia Gibbons, Andrea Nulty, Harry G Kennedy |
| Abstract |
The START and SAPROF are newly developed fourth generation structured professional judgement instruments assessing strengths and protective factors. The DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 also measure positive factors, programme completion and recovery in forensic settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 41 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2013.
All research outputs
#18,342,133
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,844
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,476
of 198,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#46
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.