You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha Abshire, Victor D. Dinglas, Maan Isabella A. Cajita, Michelle N. Eakin, Dale M. Needham, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 31% |
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 46% |
| Scientists | 13 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 278 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 15% |
| Psychology | 39 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,760,564
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#219
of 2,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,383
of 324,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.