You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global health initiative investments and health systems strengthening: a content analysis of global fund investments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Globalization and Health, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-9-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley E Warren, Kaspar Wyss, George Shakarishvili, Rifat Atun, Don de Savigny |
| Abstract |
Millions of dollars are invested annually under the umbrella of national health systems strengthening. Global health initiatives provide funding for low- and middle-income countries through disease-oriented programmes while maintaining that the interventions simultaneously strengthen systems. However, it is as yet unclear which, and to what extent, system-level interventions are being funded by these initiatives, nor is it clear how much funding they allocate to disease-specific activities - through conventional 'vertical-programming' approach. Such funding can be channelled to one or more of the health system building blocks while targeting disease(s) or explicitly to system-wide activities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Cambodia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 21% |
| Researcher | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 19% |
| Unknown | 69 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 47 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,039,124
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#341
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,109
of 209,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.