You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular disease risk factors in young children: a cross-sectional study (the IDEFICS study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Jiménez-Pavón, Kenn Konstabel, Patrick Bergman, Wolfgang Ahrens, Hermann Pohlabeln, Charalampos Hadjigeorgiou, Alfonso Siani, Licia Iacoviello, Dénes Molnár, Stefaan De Henauw, Yannis Pitsiladis, Luis A Moreno |
| Abstract |
The relevance of physical activity (PA) for combating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in children has been highlighted, but to date there has been no large-scale study analyzing that association in children aged ≤9 years of age. This study sought to evaluate the associations between objectively-measured PA and clustered CVD risk factors in a large sample of European children, and to provide evidence for gender-specific recommendations of PA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 37% |
| Spain | 5 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 41 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#433,416
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#337
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,236
of 201,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.