↓ Skip to main content

Immunotherapy resistance: the answers lie ahead – not in front – of us

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunotherapy resistance: the answers lie ahead – not in front – of us
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40425-017-0212-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miles C. Andrews, Jennifer A. Wargo

Abstract

Mechanisms of innate and adaptive resistance to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy are under intense investigation with a view to broadening the therapeutic potential of this form of treatment. In a recent manuscript by Zaretsky and colleagues, mutational events were identified that effectively crippled ongoing immunotherapy responses in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. These results are discussed in the light of other recent and ongoing research efforts exploring both mutational and non-mutational resistance mechanisms, highlighting the critical translational importance of longitudinal tumor sampling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Lecturer 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,214,801
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,462
of 3,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,393
of 323,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.