You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and initial validation of the Influences on Patient Safety Behaviours Questionnaire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Taylor, Sahdia Parveen, Victoria Robins, Beverley Slater, Rebecca Lawton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,049,465
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,094
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,755
of 210,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.