↓ Skip to main content

An investigation of objective and subjective types of binge eating episodes in a clinical sample of people with co-morbid obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Eating Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An investigation of objective and subjective types of binge eating episodes in a clinical sample of people with co-morbid obesity
Published in
Journal of Eating Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-2974-1-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marly Amorim Palavras, Christina Marcondes Morgan, Ferrari Maria Beatriz Borges, Angélica Medeiros Claudino, Phillipa J Hay

Abstract

Objective binge eating episodes (OBEs) refer to binge eating on an unusually large amount of food and are the core symptom in current definitions of bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). Subjective binge eating episodes (SBEs) refer to eating on a small or moderate amount of food (that is perceived as large) and like OBEs are associated with loss of control (LOC). Reaching consensus on what is considered a large amount of food can however be problematic and it remains unclear if the size of a binge is an essential component for defining a binge eating episode. The aim of this study was to compare the eating disorder features and general psychopathology of subjects reporting OBEs with those reporting only SBEs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Psychology 18 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,199,976
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#693
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,855
of 209,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.