↓ Skip to main content

Oxaliplatin induces different cellular and molecular chemoresistance patterns in colorectal cancer cell lines of identical origins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxaliplatin induces different cellular and molecular chemoresistance patterns in colorectal cancer cell lines of identical origins
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piroska Virag, Eva Fischer-Fodor, Maria Perde-Schrepler, Ioana Brie, Corina Tatomir, Loredana Balacescu, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe, Bogdan Victor, Ovidiu Balacescu

Abstract

Cancer cells frequently adopt cellular and molecular alterations and acquire resistance to cytostatic drugs. Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin is among the leading treatments for colorectal cancer with a response rate of 50%, inducing intrastrand cross-links on the DNA. Despite of this drug's efficiency, resistance develops in nearly all metastatic patients. Chemoresistance being of crucial importance for the drug's clinical efficiency this study aimed to contribute to the identification and description of some cellular and molecular alterations induced by prolonged oxaliplatin therapy. Resistance to oxaliplatin was induced in Colo320 (Colo320R) and HT-29 (HT-29R) colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines by exposing the cells to increasing concentrations of the drug. Alterations in morphology, cytotoxicity, DNA cross-links formation and gene expression profiles were assessed in the parental and resistant variants with microscopy, MTT, alkaline comet and pangenomic microarray assays, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,709
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,976
of 206,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#132
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.