You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global health actors no longer in favor of user fees: a documentary study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Globalization and Health, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-8603-9-29 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emilie Robert, Valéry Ridde |
Abstract |
Since the advent of health user fees in low- and middle-income countries in the 1980s, the discourse of global health actors (GHAs) has changed to the disadvantage of this type of healthcare financing mechanism. The aim of the study was to identify and analyze the stance of GHAs in the debate on user fees. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 24% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Palestine, State of | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Senegal | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 140 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
Researcher | 14 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Other | 27 | 18% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 29% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 34 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,420,827
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#209
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,031
of 209,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.