↓ Skip to main content

The effect of shoe toe box shape and volume on forefoot interdigital and plantar pressures in healthy females

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
32 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of shoe toe box shape and volume on forefoot interdigital and plantar pressures in healthy females
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-6-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Branthwaite, Nachiappan Chockalingam, Andrew Greenhalgh

Abstract

Ill-fitting footwear can be detrimental to foot health with the forefoot being an area for most discomfort. Studies on footwear have primarily examined sports or orthopaedic prescription shoes and little is known about the effects that everyday flat shoes have on the forefoot. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of toe box shape in a popular slip-on pump on dorsal and plantar pressures with particular interest around the forefoot in a healthy female population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 133 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Engineering 14 10%
Sports and Recreations 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 38 28%