↓ Skip to main content

Public health communications and alert fatigue

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
33 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public health communications and alert fatigue
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet G Baseman, Debra Revere, Ian Painter, Mariko Toyoji, Hanne Thiede, Jeffrey Duchin

Abstract

Health care providers play a significant role in large scale health emergency planning, detection, response, recovery and communication with the public. The effectiveness of health care providers in emergency preparedness and response roles depends, in part, on public health agencies communicating information in a way that maximizes the likelihood that the message is delivered, received, deemed credible and, when appropriate, acted on. However, during an emergency, health care providers can become inundated with alerts and advisories through numerous national, state, local and professional communication channels. We conducted an alert fatigue study as a sub-study of a larger randomized controlled trial which aimed to identify the most effective methods of communicating public health messages between public health agencies and providers. We report an analysis of the effects of public health message volume/frequency on recall of specific message content and effect of rate of message communications on health care provider alert fatigue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Psychology 10 8%
Computer Science 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 31 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#972,403
of 21,463,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#264
of 7,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,568
of 175,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,463,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them