↓ Skip to main content

Systems thinking in practice: the current status of the six WHO building blocks for health system strengthening in three BHOMA intervention districts of Zambia: a baseline qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems thinking in practice: the current status of the six WHO building blocks for health system strengthening in three BHOMA intervention districts of Zambia: a baseline qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-291
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilbroad Mutale, Virginia Bond, Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge, Susan Mlewa, Dina Balabanova, Neil Spicer, Helen Ayles

Abstract

The primary bottleneck to achieving the MDGs in low-income countries is health systems that are too fragile to deliver the volume and quality of services to those in need. Strong and effective health systems are increasingly considered a prerequisite to reducing the disease burden and to achieving the health MDGs. Zambia is one of the countries that are lagging behind in achieving millennium development targets. Several barriers have been identified as hindering the progress towards health related millennium development goals. Designing an intervention that addresses these barriers was crucial and so the Better Health Outcomes through Mentorship (BHOMA) project was designed to address the challenges in the Zambia's MOH using a system wide approach. We applied systems thinking approach to describe the baseline status of the Six WHO building blocks for health system strengthening.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Unknown 317 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 24%
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 79 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 27%
Social Sciences 45 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 92 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,396,826
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,845
of 8,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,926
of 205,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#27
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.