You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra K Thygesen, Christian F Christiansen, Steffen Christensen, Timothy L Lash, Henrik T Sørensen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 446 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 107 | 23% |
| Researcher | 97 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 16% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 257 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,172,944
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#480
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,958
of 124,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.