↓ Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical appraisal and medicinal use of plants in Patriata, New Murree, evidence from Pakistan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnobotanical appraisal and medicinal use of plants in Patriata, New Murree, evidence from Pakistan
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ejaz Ahmed, Muhammad Arshad, Abdul Saboor, Rahmatullah Qureshi, Ghazala Mustafa, Shumaila Sadiq, Sunbal Khalil Chaudhari

Abstract

This paper reflects the empirical findings of an ethnobotanical survey which was undertaken in Patriata (New Murree) of district Rawalpindi in Pakistan. The aims and objectives of the study were to document indigenous knowledge of plants particularly of medicinal, veterinary, fruit, vegetable, fodder, fuel etc.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 32%
Unspecified 22 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,954
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#511
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,284
of 192,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.