↓ Skip to main content

The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of creatine monohydrate on body composition and strength

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 950)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of pre versus post workout supplementation of creatine monohydrate on body composition and strength
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-10-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Antonio, Victoria Ciccone

Abstract

Chronic supplementation with creatine monohydrate has been shown to promote increases in total intramuscular creatine, phosphocreatine, skeletal muscle mass, lean body mass and muscle fiber size. Furthermore, there is robust evidence that muscular strength and power will also increase after supplementing with creatine. However, it is not known if the timing of creatine supplementation will affect the adaptive response to exercise. Thus, the purpose of this investigation was to determine the difference between pre versus post exercise supplementation of creatine on measures of body composition and strength.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 257 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 521 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 143 27%
Student > Master 72 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 7%
Other 37 7%
Researcher 29 5%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 140 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 142 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 8%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Other 68 13%
Unknown 149 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 359. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#90,518
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#43
of 950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,883
of 449,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#42
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.