You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do mass media campaigns improve physical activity? a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/0778-7367-71-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ajibola I Abioye, Kaveh Hajifathalian, Goodarz Danaei |
| Abstract |
Mass media campaigns are frequently used to influence the health behaviors of various populations. There are currently no quantitative meta-analyses of the effect of mass media campaigns on physical activity in adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 31% |
| Australia | 9 | 23% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 31% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,176,095
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#33
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,882
of 209,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them