↓ Skip to main content

Organ-specific remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in response to spaceflight

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 3,421)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Organ-specific remodeling of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in response to spaceflight
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-13-112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Lisa Paul, Agata K Zupanska, Eric R Schultz, Robert J Ferl

Abstract

Spaceflight presents a novel environment that is outside the evolutionary experience of terrestrial organisms. Full activation of the International Space Station as a science platform complete with sophisticated plant growth chambers, laboratory benches, and procedures for effective sample return, has enabled a new level of research capability and hypothesis testing in this unique environment. The opportunity to examine the strategies of environmental sensing in spaceflight, which includes the absence of unit gravity, provides a unique insight into the balance of influence among abiotic cues directing plant growth and development: including gravity, light, and touch. The data presented here correlate morphological and transcriptome data from replicated spaceflight experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Engineering 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2017.
All research outputs
#482,417
of 24,394,175 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#9
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,622
of 202,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.