↓ Skip to main content

CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-13-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yasutaka Ichikawa, Kakuya Kitagawa, Naoki Nagasawa, Shuichi Murashima, Hajime Sakuma

Abstract

The recently developed model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) enables significant reduction of image noise and artifacts, compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) and filtered back projection (FBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate lesion detectability of low-dose chest computed tomography (CT) with MBIR in comparison with ASIR and FBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Other 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 57%
Engineering 5 10%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,196,821
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#444
of 589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,269
of 197,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 589 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.