You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
4273π: Bioinformatics education on low cost ARM hardware
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-14-243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Barker, David EK Ferrier, Peter WH Holland, John BO Mitchell, Heleen Plaisier, Michael G Ritchie, Steven D Smart |
| Abstract |
Teaching bioinformatics at universities is complicated by typical computer classroom settings. As well as running software locally and online, students should gain experience of systems administration. For a future career in biology or bioinformatics, the installation of software is a useful skill. We propose that this may be taught by running the course on GNU/Linux running on inexpensive Raspberry Pi computer hardware, for which students may be granted full administrator access. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 19% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 50% |
| Scientists | 41 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 97 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 39% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#407,454
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#14
of 7,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,964
of 202,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.