↓ Skip to main content

Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anil N Makam, Holly J Lanham, Kim Batchelor, Lipika Samal, Brett Moran, Temple Howell-Stampley, Lynne Kirk, Manjula Cherukuri, Noel Santini, Luci K Leykum, Ethan A Halm

Abstract

Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 17%
Researcher 21 17%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 35%
Computer Science 22 17%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 12 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,481,675
of 17,153,337 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#106
of 1,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,318
of 166,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,153,337 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them