You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anil N Makam, Holly J Lanham, Kim Batchelor, Lipika Samal, Brett Moran, Temple Howell-Stampley, Lynne Kirk, Manjula Cherukuri, Noel Santini, Luci K Leykum, Ethan A Halm |
Abstract |
Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 44% |
India | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
Researcher | 23 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 36% |
Computer Science | 22 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,044,576
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#121
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,566
of 197,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.