↓ Skip to main content

Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anil N Makam, Holly J Lanham, Kim Batchelor, Lipika Samal, Brett Moran, Temple Howell-Stampley, Lynne Kirk, Manjula Cherukuri, Noel Santini, Luci K Leykum, Ethan A Halm

Abstract

Despite considerable financial incentives for adoption, there is little evidence available about providers' use and satisfaction with key functions of electronic health records (EHRs) that meet "meaningful use" criteria.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 36%
Computer Science 22 15%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#2,044,576
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#121
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,566
of 197,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.