↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of eating and rumination behaviour in cows using a noseband pressure sensor

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of eating and rumination behaviour in cows using a noseband pressure sensor
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-9-164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ueli Braun, Luzia Trösch, Franz Nydegger, Michael Hässig

Abstract

An automated technique for recording eating and rumination behaviour was evaluated in ten lactating Brown Swiss cows by comparing data obtained from a pressure sensor with data obtained via direct observation over a 24-hour period. The recording device involved a pressure sensor integrated in the noseband of a halter. The analysed variables included number and duration of individual rumination, eating and resting phases, total daily length of these phases and number of cuds chewed per day.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 40%
Engineering 8 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,080,585
of 5,036,908 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#238
of 878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,071
of 95,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,036,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 878 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.