↓ Skip to main content

Acute exercise and oxidative stress: a 30 year history

Overview of attention for article published in Dynamic Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
417 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute exercise and oxidative stress: a 30 year history
Published in
Dynamic Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1476-5918-8-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey Fisher-Wellman, Richard J Bloomer

Abstract

The topic of exercise-induced oxidative stress has received considerable attention in recent years, with close to 300 original investigations published since the early work of Dillard and colleagues in 1978. Single bouts of aerobic and anaerobic exercise can induce an acute state of oxidative stress. This is indicated by an increased presence of oxidized molecules in a variety of tissues. Exercise mode, intensity, and duration, as well as the subject population tested, all can impact the extent of oxidation. Moreover, the use of antioxidant supplements can impact the findings. Although a single bout of exercise often leads to an acute oxidative stress, in accordance with the principle of hormesis, such an increase appears necessary to allow for an up-regulation in endogenous antioxidant defenses. This review presents a comprehensive summary of original investigations focused on exercise-induced oxidative stress. This should provide the reader with a well-documented account of the research done within this area of science over the past 30 years.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 441 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 15%
Student > Bachelor 64 14%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 39 8%
Other 101 22%
Unknown 45 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 104 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 64 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,653,323
of 16,110,099 outputs
Outputs from Dynamic Medicine
#11
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,531
of 161,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dynamic Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,110,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them