↓ Skip to main content

A goal management intervention for polyarthritis patients: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A goal management intervention for polyarthritis patients: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roos Y Arends, Christina Bode, Erik Taal, Mart AFJ Van de Laar

Abstract

A health promotion intervention was developed for inflammatory arthritis patients, based on goal management. Elevated levels of depression and anxiety symptoms, which indicate maladjustment, are found in such patients. Other indicators of adaptation to chronic disease are positive affect, purpose in life and social participation. The new intervention focuses on to improving adaptation by increasing psychological and social well-being and decreasing symptoms of affective disorders. Content includes how patients can cope with activities and life goals that are threatened or have become impossible to attain due to arthritis. The four goal management strategies used are: goal maintenance, goal adjustment, goal disengagement and reengagement. Ability to use various goal management strategies, coping versatility and self-efficacy are hypothesized to mediate the intervention's effect on primary and secondary outcomes. The primary outcome is depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes are anxiety symptoms, positive affect, purpose in life, social participation, pain, fatigue and physical functioning. A cost-effectiveness analysis and stakeholders' analysis are planned.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 221 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 69 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,276,424
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,444
of 4,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,686
of 197,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#57
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.