↓ Skip to main content

The role of chest ultrasonography in the management of respiratory diseases: document II

Overview of attention for article published in Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of chest ultrasonography in the management of respiratory diseases: document II
Published in
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-6958-8-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Smargiassi, Riccardo Inchingolo, Gino Soldati, Roberto Copetti, Giampietro Marchetti, Alessandro Zanforlin, Rosangela Giannuzzi, Americo Testa, Stefano Nardini, Salvatore Valente

Abstract

Chest ultrasonography can be a useful diagnostic tool for respiratory physicians. It can be used to complete and widen the general objective examination also in emergency situations, at the patient's bedside. The aim of this document is to promote better knowledge and more widespread use of thoracic ultrasound among respiratory physicians in Italy.This document II is focused on advanced approaches to chest ultrasonography especially in diagnosing sonographic interstitial syndrome with physical hypotheses about the genesis of vertical artifacts, differential diagnosis of cardiogenic pulmonary edema and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, raising diagnostic suspicion of pulmonary embolism, ultrasound characterization of lung consolidations and the use of ultrasonography to guide procedural interventions in pulmonology.Finally, document II focuses on chest ultrasonography as useful diagnostic tool in neonatal and pediatric care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,264,355
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#103
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,535
of 209,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.