↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the German version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of the German version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Doering, Markus Burgmer, Gereon Heuft, Dina Menke, Brigitta Bäumer, Margit Lübking, Marcus Feldmann, Susanne Hörz, Gudrun Schneider

Abstract

The assessment of personality organization and its observable behavioral manifestations, i.e. personality functioning, has a long tradition in psychodynamic psychiatry. Recently, the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale has moved it into the focus of psychiatric diagnostics. Based on Kernberg's concept of personality organization the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO) was developed for diagnosing personality functioning. The STIPO covers seven dimensions: (1) identity, (2) object relations, (3) primitive defenses, (4) coping/rigidity, (5) aggression, (6) moral values, and (7) reality testing and perceptual distortions. The English version of the STIPO has previously revealed satisfying psychometric properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#13,388,742
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,789
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,715
of 197,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#28
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.