↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare providers’ knowledge, experience and challenges of reporting adverse events following immunisation: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthcare providers’ knowledge, experience and challenges of reporting adverse events following immunisation: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adriana Parrella, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Michael Gold, Helen Marshall, Peter Baghurst

Abstract

Healthcare provider spontaneous reporting of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is central to monitoring post-licensure vaccine safety, but little is known about how healthcare professionals recognise and report to surveillance systems. The aim of this study was explore the knowledge, experience and attitudes of medical and nursing professionals towards detecting and reporting AEFI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 26 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,682,142
of 15,923,805 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#720
of 5,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,072
of 160,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,923,805 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them