↓ Skip to main content

Zoonotic helminths affecting the human eye

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zoonotic helminths affecting the human eye
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-4-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico Otranto, Mark L Eberhard

Abstract

Nowaday, zoonoses are an important cause of human parasitic diseases worldwide and a major threat to the socio-economic development, mainly in developing countries. Importantly, zoonotic helminths that affect human eyes (HIE) may cause blindness with severe socio-economic consequences to human communities. These infections include nematodes, cestodes and trematodes, which may be transmitted by vectors (dirofilariasis, onchocerciasis, thelaziasis), food consumption (sparganosis, trichinellosis) and those acquired indirectly from the environment (ascariasis, echinococcosis, fascioliasis). Adult and/or larval stages of HIE may localize into human ocular tissues externally (i.e., lachrymal glands, eyelids, conjunctival sacs) or into the ocular globe (i.e., intravitreous retina, anterior and or posterior chamber) causing symptoms due to the parasitic localization in the eyes or to the immune reaction they elicit in the host. Unfortunately, data on HIE are scant and mostly limited to case reports from different countries. The biology and epidemiology of the most frequently reported HIE are discussed as well as clinical description of the diseases, diagnostic considerations and video clips on their presentation and surgical treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 191 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 32 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,017,772
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#337
of 5,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,127
of 114,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.