↓ Skip to main content

Maintenance of genome stability by Fanconi anemia proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maintenance of genome stability by Fanconi anemia proteins
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13578-016-0134-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Palovcak, Wenjun Liu, Fenghua Yuan, Yanbin Zhang

Abstract

Persistent dysregulation of the DNA damage response and repair in cells causes genomic instability. The resulting genetic changes permit alterations in growth and proliferation observed in virtually all cancers. However, an unstable genome can serve as a double-edged sword by providing survival advantages in the ability to evade checkpoint signaling, but also creating vulnerabilities through dependency on alternative genomic maintenance factors. The Fanconi anemia pathway comprises an intricate network of DNA damage signaling and repair that are critical for protection against genomic instability. The importance of this pathway is underlined by the severity of the cancer predisposing syndrome Fanconi anemia which can be caused by biallelic mutations in any one of the 21 genes known thus far. This review delineates the roles of the Fanconi anemia pathway and the molecular actions of Fanconi anemia proteins in confronting replicative, oxidative, and mitotic stress.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Unspecified 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,012,293
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#156
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,189
of 311,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them