You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chloë FitzGerald, Samia Hurst |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 107 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 172 | 78% |
| Scientists | 22 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,082 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2080 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 275 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 241 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 171 | 8% |
| Researcher | 143 | 7% |
| Other | 380 | 18% |
| Unknown | 696 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 391 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 320 | 15% |
| Psychology | 174 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 137 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 2% |
| Other | 258 | 12% |
| Unknown | 762 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 624. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#36,355
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#745
of 325,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.