You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Visual inspection with acetic acid as a cervical cancer test: accuracy validated using latent class analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-7-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynne Gaffikin, John A McGrath, Marc Arbyn, Paul D Blumenthal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,522,616
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,098
of 2,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,356
of 66,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.