↓ Skip to main content

No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No correlation between slip reduction in low-grade spondylolisthesis or change in neuroforaminal morphology and clinical outcome
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-245
Pubmed ID
Authors

HS Femke Hagenmaier, Diyar Delawi, Nico Verschoor, F Cumhur Oner, Job LC van Susante

Abstract

In instrumented posterolateral fusion reduction of a spondylolisthesis is appealing on theoretical grounds since this may lead to indirect decompression of the entrapped nerve roots. However, there is no consensus in the literature whether a beneficial effect of reduction on outcome can be expected. The objective of the current study was to evaluate whether a correlation between the extent of listhesis reduction and clinical improvement could be established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Other 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 55%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,482,255
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,430
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,862
of 204,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#26
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.