↓ Skip to main content

Improving metabolic parameters of antipsychotic child treatment (IMPACT) study: rationale, design, and methods

Overview of attention for article published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving metabolic parameters of antipsychotic child treatment (IMPACT) study: rationale, design, and methods
Published in
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1753-2000-7-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gloria M Reeves, Courtney Keeton, Christoph U Correll, Jacqueline L Johnson, Robert M Hamer, Linmarie Sikich, Lindsey Hazzard, Cheryl Alderman, Abigail Scheer, Micah Mabe, Sandeep Kapoor, Eva Sheridan, Irmgard Borner, Kristin Bussell, Sara Pirmohamed, Terrence C Bethea, Raja Chekuri, Rhoda Gottfried, Shauna P Reinblatt, Erin Santana, Mark A Riddle

Abstract

Youth with serious mental illness may experience improved psychiatric stability with second generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication treatment, but unfortunately may also experience unhealthy weight gain adverse events. Research on weight loss strategies for youth who require ongoing antipsychotic treatment is quite limited. The purpose of this paper is to present the design, methods, and rationale of the Improving Metabolic Parameters in Antipsychotic Child Treatment (IMPACT) study, a federally funded, randomized trial comparing two pharmacologic strategies against a control condition to manage SGA-related weight gain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 20%
Psychology 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,653,708
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#676
of 782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,527
of 207,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.