You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-7-32 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A Barbieri, K Vanhaecht, P Van Herck, W Sermeus, F Faggiano, S Marchisio, M Panella |
Abstract |
A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the use of clinical pathways for hip and knee joint replacements when compared with standard medical care. The impact of clinical pathways was evaluated assessing the major outcomes of in-hospital hip and knee joint replacement processes: postoperative complications, number of patients discharged at home, length of in-hospital stay and direct costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 208 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 19% |
Researcher | 26 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
Other | 50 | 22% |
Unknown | 43 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 9% |
Unknown | 50 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,245,580
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,609
of 3,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,984
of 111,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.