↓ Skip to main content

Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use among the Biate tribe of Dima Hasao District, Assam, Northeastern India

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indigenous knowledge of zootherapeutic use among the Biate tribe of Dima Hasao District, Assam, Northeastern India
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert Lalduhawma Sajem Betlu

Abstract

The present study addresses the use of zootherapy in the traditional healthcare system of the Biate tribe of Dima Hasao district, Assam, India. It sought to identify the different species used for zootherapeutic use with the detailed methods of usages to create awareness and contribute to the conservation and sustainable utilization of the resources.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
France 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Environmental Science 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,198,525
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#658
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,147
of 197,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.