You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of emergency department performance – a systematic review on recommended performance and quality-in-care measures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-21-62 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christian Michel Sørup, Peter Jacobsen, Jakob Lundager Forberg |
Abstract |
Evaluation of emergency department (ED) performance remains a difficult task due to the lack of consensus on performance measures that reflects high quality, efficiency, and sustainability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Other | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
Other | 44 | 22% |
Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 10% |
Engineering | 14 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 47 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,676,675
of 24,832,302 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#968
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,582
of 203,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,832,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.